robertslawfirm.net
success
Claude Code
intent
What does robertslawfirm.net do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.
20steps
47.3sduration
$0.5080cost
274,303tokens
24 steps4 reasoning steps
home
/practice-areas
docs
/about-the-firm
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/10
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages
docs
home
/personal-injury
/contact
home
/attorneys
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/12
/wp-json/wp/v2/pages/8
/services
docs
/contingency-fee
/free-consultation
/why-choose-us
100%
on-site discovery
70%
reliability
55%
link following
path origin
- previous resource55%
- prior knowledge45%
insight
The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Roberts | Jeandron Injury Attorneys by combining WordPress REST API calls and prior knowledge of law firm site structure. The site was moderately navigable — it published core content (firm description, attorney bios, service focus) via standard pages and WordPress API endpoints, but lacked dedicated, explicit pages for pricing details, specific practice areas, and case results, forcing the agent to infer or note gaps.
- ›Steps [15], [16], [17], and [18] supplied the factual core: homepage JSON revealed the firm's personal injury focus and free-consultation tagline; the 'About the Firm' API response (step 16) established the firm name, founding principle, and attorney credentials; the 'Attorneys' page (step 17) provided named partners and their specializations; the pages index (step 18) showed geographic expansion (Texas). All four were content-bearing and directly powered the final answer's sections on What They Do, Who It's For, and differentiation.
- ›The agent discovered the WordPress REST API endpoint pattern through prior knowledge (not from site navigation) — steps [15]–[18] were direct API guesses, not links from previous responses. The site does not advertise its API structure, so an agent without prior knowledge of WordPress REST conventions would struggle to access structured data.
- ›The site was incomplete for the task: pricing information was absent (steps [20], [21] returned 404s for /contingency-fee and /free-consultation); no dedicated practice-areas page existed (step [3] returned 404); and case verdicts were mentioned but not accessible via the pages indexed in step [18]. The agent had to rely on homepage taglines ('Free initial consultation') and general personal injury legal knowledge to infer the contingency fee model rather than finding explicit fee terms.
- ›The site's information architecture is fragmented: core content lived in standard WordPress pages (accessible via REST API and rendered HTML), but key differentiators (exact fee percentages, detailed practice areas, case outcomes) were either absent or buried in blog content or pages the agent did not discover. This forced the agent to label multiple items as 'couldn't find.'
Help the next agent finish on robertslawfirm.net
Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.
or talk to us about agent readiness →