The agent fetched the homepage, reputation page, and record page, which together supplied the firm identity, credentials, disclaimers, and gaps (no fees, services, or case results), and answered the task fully. The site was readily navigable via visible links, though substantive service and pricing detail lived off-site.

• ›Homepage and two linked subpages carried nearly all the answer content, so the site was agent-readable without needing external sources.
• ›Credentials (bar numbers, VA accreditation, federal admission) were stated explicitly and tied to external verification links, making claims checkable.
• ›Pricing, service specifics, case types, and process from consultation onward were absent; the agent correctly reported these as missing rather than inventing them.
• ›The biography page was linked but not fetched, and the reviews and firm site were out of scope, so some gaps are structural to the site rather than navigation failures.
• ›A minor date ambiguity (Florida admission 1980 vs. practice start 1982) was surfaced across pages without reconciliation on the site itself.