Agent successfully gathered comprehensive information about Digital Notary's core offering, pricing, target audience, and differentiation by fetching the homepage and pricing page. The site presented information clearly in fetchable form, though explicit competitor comparisons and cost justifications for add-ons remained opaque.

• ›The agent relied on only 2 unique URLs (homepage and /prijzen pricing page), both guessed from memory rather than discovered through site navigation — suggesting the site's internal linking for comparative or detailed information is sparse or the agent did not explore beyond primary pages.
• ›Step [1] and [3] are duplicates (both homepage fetches), indicating the agent re-fetched the homepage rather than discovering new links from it, suggesting either insufficient internal linking or the agent's attempt to gather information it couldn't find on a single pass.
• ›Pricing information was cleanly presented and structured on /prijzen ([2]), enabling the agent to extract exact figures, tiers, and add-on costs directly without interpretation — site is well-optimized for pricing discovery.
• ›The agent explicitly noted missing information about competitor positioning and cost comparisons against traditional notaries ([5] trajectory), confirming the site does not surface these differentiators in fetchable form despite mentioning a 'comparison tool'.
• ›Regulatory and process details (eIDAS signatures, Nxchange partnership, 4-7 day timeline) were embedded in fetched page content ([4]), showing the site does publish technical compliance information, but not always in discoverable or linkable sections.