Agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of immediac's business from two content-bearing pages (homepage and /services), but the site lacks pricing transparency, process details, and clear onboarding instructions—forcing the agent to acknowledge significant gaps rather than fill them with unsourced claims.

• ›Steps [1] and [4] contained all substantive business information; steps [2], [3], and [5] were routing failures or redundant re-fetches that added no new content.
• ›Homepage and /services pages exposed company history (28 years), service list, portfolio clients, and value propositions (custom-first, full-service, Azure hosting), but the site deliberately omits pricing—no page exists for it (404), indicating a quote-based model the agent could not retrieve.
• ›Agent did not cite external search results or attempt to infer pricing from model memory; instead it explicitly flagged the gap as 'the most significant' finding, maintaining fidelity to what the site actually disclosed.
• ›Site structure forced agent to type URLs from memory (steps [1], [3]) rather than discover them via navigation links, and two expected pages (/pricing, /about) returned 404s, creating friction in the discovery layer.
• ›Agent's final response accurately reflects site content boundaries: it asserts only what was fetched (services, clients, 5-star support, Azure infrastructure) and avoids inventing competitor comparisons or pricing details absent from retrieved pages.