The agent could not access crux.do directly but successfully gathered comprehensive information about Crux from trycrux.com's homepage, pricing, and about pages—enough to explain the service, target audience, outcome-based pricing, and competitive positioning. However, the inability to verify crux.do was the intended domain leaves residual uncertainty.

• ›crux.do domain was unreachable (ECONNREFUSED); the agent pivoted to trycrux.com after web search, but never confirmed whether crux.do is an alias, redirect, or a different service entirely.
• ›The trycrux.com site published all core information fetchably: homepage contained what/who/differentiation; pricing page articulated the outcome-based model clearly; about page named founders and their insurance backgrounds. No page truncation or missing content in any fetched response.
• ›The agent had to infer that 'crux.do' likely maps to trycrux.com via search results—the site did not surface this mapping itself. Navigation was discovery-centric (web search, then direct URL guessing) rather than link-following from the domain.
• ›Pricing specifics (exact cost per task, trial availability, POC terms) were not published; the site directs users to sales. The agent correctly identified this gap rather than hallucinating rates.
• ›The agent cited all three content sources explicitly in its final response, making the lineage clear and verifiable.