Agent successfully gathered a comprehensive description of WCI's positioning, services, and target market from three pages. The site was moderately navigable but deliberately opaque on pricing, location, and post-contact process — requiring the agent to infer entry price from a contact form's budget bands and acknowledge that critical commercial details were unpublished.

• ›All three fetches (homepage, studio, contact) were explicitly cited in the final Sources section and directly supplied the factual basis for every major answer section — no external research or model inference filled gaps in core positioning.
• ›The site publishes service names and engagement types on the homepage but only via their whimsical labels ('The Alchemist,' 'The Trickster,' 'The Long Game'), forcing the agent to extract substantive details and repackage them for clarity — structural presentation was more narrative than reference.
• ›Pricing was deliberately withheld from the site itself; the agent inferred project minimums only from the contact form's budget selector ($3k–$25k+ bands) and correctly flagged this as inference rather than published data.
• ›The Studio page (step [1]) was the only source for team names, credentials, and process philosophy, and it did not disclose location despite the Brazil LinkedIn hint — the site offers no explicit About or Company Info page.
• ›The contact form (step [2]) included a 'Company' field marked 'leave blank,' which the agent correctly identified as a spam trap rather than a real required field, showing critical reading of form signals.