The agent successfully grasped Angel Softwares' core offering (sovereign AI agents for Canadian enterprises) and pricing model (free diagnostic, no published rates) by fetching the homepage and FAQ. The site is moderately navigable but incomplete: it omits pricing ranges, competitor comparisons, numeric proof of results, team credentials, and contains a conflicting company-age claim, forcing the agent to flag gaps rather than provide complete answers.

• ›The homepage and FAQ were the only pages fetched; both were directly cited as sources. The agent did not access /demarche/ or /confidentialite/, so it acknowledged that omission rather than inventing answers about the approach or privacy policy.
• ›No pricing information exists on the fetched pages—the site only offers a free 30-minute diagnostic with no cost ranges, packages, or engagement models disclosed. The agent reported this absence clearly instead of estimating.
• ›The site contains a factual contradiction ('six years' vs. 'since 2024') that appeared in different parts of the page; the agent caught and reported it, signaling either poor editorial consistency or conflicting claims about founding vs. incorporation.
• ›Client logos (18 names including Beneva, Héroux-Devtek, Medial) are displayed without case studies, measured outcomes, or ties to specific work; the agent noted this lack of proof without over-inferring from the logos alone.
• ›The site claims '100% Canada' sovereignty but offers two infrastructure options—one (open models in Canada) is stronger than the other (providers with contractual Canadian residency), yet the weaker option wasn't flagged as a potential gap in control; the agent did catch the inconsistency with the headline claim.