Agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Rikshem's business model, ownership, geographic reach, and positioning from the main website and English company facts page. The site was moderately navigable (homepage and /om-oss worked; several /hitta-bostad and pricing routes returned 404s), forcing the agent to rely on well-structured company overview pages rather than a visible apartment-search or pricing interface.

• ›The homepage and /om-oss pages were content-rich and directly answered 'what they do' and 'who they serve,' but the site's navigation structure appears fragmented—multiple expected paths (/hitta-bostad, /hyror-och-priser, /lediga-bostader) returned 404, suggesting either routing issues or a site redesign mid-run.
• ›Pricing was the biggest deliberate omission: the agent found explicit statements that the site 'does not display specific rental prices' and requires users to contact customer service or browse individual listings. This was site-confirmed, not a missing fetch—Rikshem intentionally reserves pricing for per-property discovery, not upfront transparency.
• ›The site successfully positioned itself through institutional backing (pension funds), nationwide presence, in-house operations, and sustainability focus, with no explicit competitor naming—the agent had to infer competitive positioning from absence rather than explicit claims.
• ›The agent attempted 6 fetches across the run; 3 succeeded (steps 1, 4, 7, 11) and 3 returned 404 (steps 2, 3, 5, 6), all 404s being 'expected' pages for apartment search or pricing that the site either doesn't surface or has moved/removed.
• ›The agent filled gaps via web search for comparative context (step 9: general Swedish rental prices, step 11: English company facts), but the core answer—what Rikshem is and does—came entirely from the two main site pages, making the task successfully answerable from site content alone.