The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Peak Planet by combining fragments from the live site (homepage, about, routes, safaris, Zanzibar pages) with pricing and FAQ data discovered via web search. The site is navigable but poorly organized for agent discovery: pricing lives on blog posts and nested URLs rather than a central page, key differentiators (guide-ownership) are buried in the About section, and the main navigation lacks a pricing or packages index, forcing the agent to rely on 62% prior knowledge and 15% web search to fill gaps.

• ›Step [1] (homepage) returned visual branding and hero messaging but minimal substantive detail about what Peak Planet does or its model—the agent had to dig further into subpages.
• ›Steps [4], [6], [15], [16] (About, Routes, Safaris, Zanzibar) provided thematic content and confirmed service offerings (climbing, safaris, beach extensions) but none consolidated pricing, inclusion details, or competitive positioning in a single structured artifact.
• ›Step [12] (kilimanjaro-group-dates-prices) was only discovered via web search [11], indicating the site does not surface this critical URL prominently—pricing was partially buried and required external search assistance.
• ›Step [13] (FAQs) was also search-dependent, even though FAQ content is essential to explaining what was confusing or unclear; the site navigation did not offer /faqs or /faq links on the main pages tested.
• ›The agent used prior knowledge (62%) and web search (15%) to extract differentiators (guide-owned structure, KPAP certification, porter welfare, 99.8% satisfaction rate, safety standards) that were either lightly mentioned or absent from the core pages fetched.
• ›The site lacks a dedicated Pricing page (/pricing returned 404), a Packages or Climbs overview, or a consolidated comparison table—information is scattered across blog posts, nested URLs, and FAQs, requiring heavy agent synthesis rather than machine-ready publication.