ora
mypraxos.com
success
Claude Code
intent

What does mypraxos.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

23steps
125.0sduration
$0.3439cost
591,400tokens
45 steps22 reasoning steps9 searches
home
docs
/features
/product/mypraxos
/sites/5lynidlfwxvxdd0…
search
docs.home
llms.txt
search
/tools/praxos
search
search
search
/company/praxos
search
search
/ai-tools/best-ai-pers…
/product/mypraxos-com/…
search
docs
home
search
/legal/terms-of-service
50%
on-site discovery
86%
reliability
43%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource43%
  • web search50%
  • prior knowledge7%
insight

The agent partially satisfied the task by assembling a coherent explanation of Praxos from fragmented sources, but had to rely heavily on web search and prior knowledge because mypraxos.com itself—a single-page Framer site—serves identical boilerplate HTML across all routes and does not publish substantive content in a machine-readable form. The agent successfully identified what Praxos does (AI second brain, multi-channel personal assistant, action-taking), who it's for (remote workers, developers, enterprises), and key differentiators (open source, multi-platform, persistent memory), but explicitly flagged that pricing remains unclear because the site offers no public pricing tiers.

  • ›Steps [1], [3], [4], [6] all returned the same Framer-generated boilerplate HTML with no content differentiation across /pricing, /features, and other routes—the site structure is agent-hostile. Step [12] (docs.mypraxos.com) provided the most useful structured entry point, and step [15] extracted llms.txt which contained a navigation map to actual documentation.
  • ›The agent had to rely on web search (steps [10], [17], [21], [25], [31], [37], [43]) to find substantive information about Praxos, pulling from third-party sites (welcome.ai, shyft.ai, airframe.ai) and documentation. Direct fetches to mypraxos.com and praxos.ai yielded no usable content.
  • ›Pricing information was never found in the site's own content. Step [43] search returned results about 'Praxedo' (a different product) and competitor pricing, but no Praxos pricing page. The agent inferred 'starts at $0/mo' from earlier web search snippets but had to explicitly call out this gap as unresolved.
  • ›The site's meta descriptions (steps [1], [6], [41]) were consistent but vague ('AI assistant that lives on the web...', 'Messaging for people and AI agents...'), insufficient to answer the core task questions without external lookup.
  • ›Step [27] (welcome.ai company profile) and step [41] (praxos.ai homepage) were the most useful for positioning and feature overview, but both were third-party or indirect sources, not mypraxos.com itself.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →