southwest.com
success
Claude Code
intent

What does southwest.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

14steps
66.2sduration
$0.6114cost
162,569tokens
21 steps7 reasoning steps3 searches
home
/about-southwest
/about-southwest
/fares
/air/rapid-rewards
/air/rapid-rewards-pro…
search
/fare-information
search
search
/air/rapid-rewards
/air/products-and-serv…
/traveling-with-us
/html/customer-service…
91%
on-site discovery
45%
reliability
55%
link following
path origin
  • previous resource55%
  • web search9%
  • prior knowledge36%
insight

The agent assembled a comprehensive explanation of Southwest Airlines by relying almost entirely on web search results and prior knowledge, since southwest.com itself was largely inaccessible—most direct fetches returned truncated JavaScript-heavy responses or 404 errors. The agent successfully answered the core task (what Southwest does, who it's for, pricing, and differentiators) but had to work around the site's poor machine-readability, ultimately grounding its answer in external sources rather than the official website.

  • ›Steps [1], [3], [4], [12], [17] fetched from southwest.com but returned only boilerplate HTML headers and truncated script tags—no usable content about services, pricing, or positioning. The site appears heavily JavaScript-rendered, making static fetch unusable.
  • ›Multiple internal URL guesses ([5], [7], [8], [11], [14], [15]) returned 404 errors, indicating either site restructuring or poor discoverability of key content pages (Rapid Rewards, pricing tiers, product/service overviews).
  • ›Steps [10], [18], [19] (web searches) were the only content-bearing sources. Search results returned external articles about Southwest's 2026 pricing changes, fare tiers, competitive position, and ancillary services (hotels, car rentals), which the agent cited in its Sources section. The agent did NOT find this information on southwest.com itself.
  • ›The agent correctly identified that southwest.com lacks clear, fetchable documentation of its core offerings—it had to note 'Rapid Rewards details' and 'Transitional messaging' as things it 'couldn't find' on the site.
  • ›The site is poorly agent-ready: no structured metadata, no accessible text content, navigation URLs inaccessible or non-existent, forcing reliance on external sources and prior knowledge (55% of fetches sourced from previous_artifact/prior knowledge) to answer a fundamentally site-discovery task.

Want to run your own?

Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.

or talk to us about agent readiness →