The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Dot & Key by working around the inaccessible homepage (429 rate limit) through search-driven discovery of the About Us and Offers pages, supplemented by third-party competitive analysis. The site's content was fragmented across multiple pages and required external sources to contextualize market positioning.

• ›Homepage was rate-limited (429), forcing the agent to discover information via web search (67% of URLs came from search results), not site navigation—a significant navigability friction point that required workaround.
• ›The About Us page (step 5) and Offers page (step 9) were the only direct site fetches that succeeded and contributed substantive content; both were discovered via search, not site structure or internal links.
• ›Competitive positioning (vs. Minimalist, Plum, Mamaearth) and market performance data came entirely from third-party sources (steps 11), not from the site itself—the site does not appear to publish competitive analysis or market context.
• ›Pricing information had to be assembled from two sources (steps 7 and 9): search snippets provided ranges (₹249–₹695), while the Offers page filled in bundle details and promotional structure. No single page presented complete price transparency.
• ›The agent correctly identified gaps in its own retrieval (bundle composition, ingredient-level comparisons, individual product page pricing) rather than inferring from model memory, indicating good grounding discipline despite incomplete site disclosure.