The agent retrieved content from two subdomains that contradict each other on core business identity (civil engineering + software vs. games/VR/digital studio), preventing a reliable unified explanation. The agent assembled what it found but correctly flagged the conflict rather than resolving it with guesswork; navigability was hampered by broken links on hmt.lu, a 404 on the services page, and no clear relationship between the two sites.

• ›dev.hmt.lu and hmt.lu present fundamentally different business descriptions (civil engineering + corporate vs. digital entertainment + VR), and the agent could not determine which is authoritative or whether they are separate brands. This is a critical identity problem, not a partial answer gap.
• ›Neither site publishes pricing, team details, client names (beyond a few self-published projects), certifications, office address, or service engagement models — only an email contact.
• ›dev.hmt.lu's homepage was accessed directly from memory (not discovered via links or search); hmt.lu was reached by following a link from dev.hmt.lu. The agent had to type dev.hmt.lu manually, suggesting low discoverability.
• ›hmt.lu contains broken navigation (empty menu, anchor #discover, missing /learn-more endpoint) and placeholder images, and a linked services page (hmt.lu/services) returned 404, limiting the agent's ability to drill deeper on feature details.
• ›The agent correctly stopped at step 3 rather than continuing to probe — it had exhausted the accessible content-bearing pages and identified that the contradiction cannot be resolved from the site itself, making further fetches unproductive.