frontiergtm.ai
success
Claude Code
intent
What does frontiergtm.ai do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.
9steps
50.9sduration
$0.0913cost
35,986tokens
17 steps8 reasoning steps2 searches
home
/services
docs
home
/gtm-agents
/strategy-agent
search
search
docs
67%
answer from your site
43%
answer efficiency
83%
followed site links
answer sources
- from this site67%
- from search results17%
- from agent knowledge17%
url discovery
- given in the task14%
- followed a link71%
- found via web search14%
insight
The agent gathered a reasonable overview of FrontierGTM's business model and positioning from the homepage and web search, but faced significant friction discovering deeper details: the site's navigation structure was broken (404s on /services, /about, /gtm-agents, /strategy-agent), forcing reliance on homepage content and external search. Pricing information remained opaque and incomplete despite the task explicitly asking for it.
- ›The homepage returned complete information on services, agents, and target market in step [1], but the agent could not verify or expand on it because all secondary navigation paths returned 404s (steps [3], [4], [8], [9]), indicating a site structure mismatch or incomplete routing.
- ›Pricing was assembled only from the homepage's brief mention of engagement types (consultations, sprints, fractional roles) with no costs attached; the agent correctly flagged this as opaque and incomplete, but had no alternative on-site sources to resolve it.
- ›The founder's name and background came from web search snippets and an external page (ryanvanshur.com), not the site itself—the homepage did not clearly attribute the company to an identifiable founder or include detailed credentials.
- ›The agent's final response correctly distinguished between site-derived facts (services, target market, engagement models) and search-derived facts (founder identity), and transparently called out missing information rather than inventing details.
- ›The site's broken secondary navigation (all /section URLs returning 404) suggests either a recent migration, incomplete deployment, or a single-page application with client-side routing that broke the agent's link-following strategy—the agent adapted by relying on the homepage's internal text references and web search, but a fully navigable site would have been required for a complete answer.
Help the next agent finish on frontiergtm.ai
Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.
or talk to us about agent readiness →