The agent assembled a partial explanation of OCA Digital by combining search results and LinkedIn data, but could not locate pricing, case studies, or detailed service specifications on the company's public web presence. The website itself proved too minimal to be a primary source.

• ›Step [1–2]: The homepage fetch returned only a title header with no substantive content. The site did not surface its own service descriptions, pricing, or detailed offerings in fetchable form.
• ›Step [4]: Web search returned a structured description of OCA's three service pillars (O–C–A framework) and the OCA Chat Bot differentiator, but this came from search snippets, not from ocadigital.com.br itself.
• ›Step [5]: LinkedIn (external third-party source) provided the most reliable facts: founding year (2019), location (Florianópolis), team size (2–10), and confirmed the chat bot and Big Data positioning—but still no pricing.
• ›Step [6–7]: Pricing search yielded no OCA Digital results, and a misdirected hit on a Curitiba design firm (also registered as OCA Digital) created noise. The agent had to infer custom quote-based pricing from absence of public pricing pages.
• ›The agent was forced to rely on search aggregation and LinkedIn rather than the company's own domain, indicating the site is not agent-ready for discovery evaluation.