The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive overview of AFEC's core offerings, audience, and accreditations from the homepage, but had to work around a deliberately opaque pricing structure and assemble competitive positioning from model knowledge rather than explicit site comparisons. The site was navigable for organizational facts but required direct contact for commercial details.

• ›Steps [1–4] all hit the same URL (afec.fr/) repeatedly, suggesting the homepage is the primary content hub and the site lacks deep internal navigation structure — the agent successfully extracted different fact layers from a single page but had to make multiple identical requests rather than following internal links to program pages or pricing details.
• ›Pricing was explicitly obfuscated: step [2] found funding *pathways* (CPF, OPCO, regional councils) but no actual costs, and the site directed users to contact AFEC directly. This forced the agent to flag pricing as 'most confusing' and prevented grounding that section entirely in site content.
• ›Competitive differentiation required model inference: steps [1–4] described AFEC's features (50 years, Qualiopi, accessibility) but the site made no explicit comparisons to AFPA, CNAM, or OpenClassrooms. The agent's final 'How It's Different' section drew on search context [step 6] and general knowledge rather than site claims.
• ›The agent was unable to surface competitive alternatives from the site itself (75% of URLs were followed links, but all successful fetches remained on afec.fr/); step [6] web search introduced competitor names and context, but these did NOT appear in the agent's source citations, revealing that the competitive positioning was reconstituted from model memory using search context as a prompt, not as retrievable proof.
• ›Testimonials and certifications (step [4]) were the only narrative differentiators published on the site; outcome metrics (graduation rates, employment placement rates) were absent, forcing the agent to note this as a gap and limiting its ability to substantiate value claims.