The agent successfully gathered comprehensive information about GB Online's service offering, pricing, and positioning from the homepage alone. The site presented core facts directly but left several operational details (contract terms, exact coverage, enterprise pricing, streaming bundle specifics) undisclosed or vague.

• ›All four fetches hit the same homepage URL (gbonline.com.br/), suggesting the site does not expose sub-pages via navigation or the agent did not attempt to follow internal links. The 75% 'followed a link' metric is contradicted by the trajectory; all steps were typed from memory. This indicates the homepage was dense enough to answer most questions without navigation, but also that critical details (enterprise pricing, rural fiber terms, full city list) may not be linkable.
• ›Pricing information was explicit and complete (three tiers with contract/no-contract variants), but streaming bundle mapping was ambiguous—the agent noted 'Unclear which streaming services come with which tier' despite the site mentioning Skeelo, Watch, and HBO Max. The site likely listed these without clear tier-to-service assignment.
• ›Coverage was the most opaque element: only Sinop, MT explicitly named; agent was told to contact the company to verify availability by address, indicating the site does not publish a coverage map or city list. This is a discovery friction point for prospective customers.
• ›Awards and certifications (Great Place to Work, MelhorPlano.net stability award, ANATEL) were present and agent-readable, serving as competitive differentiation signals. However, no direct competitor comparison or market-position context was found on the site itself—agent relied on framing the company as a 'regional alternative to national chains' without evidence from the page.
• ›Enterprise ('Link Dedicado') and rural ('Fibra Rural') services were named but not detailed (no pricing, speeds, or feature specifics). The site surfaced these as service categories but not as navigable product pages, forcing the agent to classify them as incomplete offerings.