The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive overview of Alphractal's core offering, target users, and competitive positioning from the public website. However, the site deliberately obscures pricing details behind an app login, forcing the agent to flag this opacity as a notable friction point in the evaluation experience.

• ›Steps [0], [2], and [3] provided complete feature and positioning content from landing pages; the site explicitly surfaced 'What They Do' and 'Who It's For' without requiring navigation guessing.
• ›Step [4] (/compare) was typed from memory—not linked from the homepage—yet returned competitive positioning content, showing the site does have comparison pages but doesn't advertise them in the navigation trail the agent followed.
• ›Pricing (step [1]) was deliberately gated: the /pricing page exists but redirects users to app.alphractal.com/plans to view actual tier details and costs. This is a deliberate UX choice that made transparent pricing retrieval impossible from the public domain.
• ›The agent's final response correctly identifies this pricing opacity as a confusing gap and notes it 'felt like a sales tactic,' demonstrating awareness of how the site's information architecture affected the evaluation task.
• ›All substantive claims about features, target users, and differentiation came from site-fetched content (steps [0], [2], [3], [4]); the agent did not supplement with model memory about Alphractal's actual market position or competitor details—only with meta-commentary about the evaluation experience itself.