The agent assembled a reasonably complete picture of Flip Inversiones by combining web search results and app store / LinkedIn pages, since the main website itself did not publish pricing, detailed fund information, or competitive positioning in a readily accessible form. The site was not self-sufficient for this discovery task — the agent had to rely on third-party sources (Google Play, LinkedIn, investment review sites) to answer questions about pricing, user base, regulatory backing, and alternatives.

• ›The main website (steps [0], [1], [2]) did not expose pricing or detailed product information. A dedicated /precios page returned 404, forcing the agent to search externally for fee structures, fund details, and company background.
• ›The agent found pricing and company details via web search (step [6]) and LinkedIn (step [5]), which revealed 50,000+ users, $250M+ AUM, and the three named funds with specific commission rates. These facts do not appear on the main website.
• ›Step [3] and [7] (web searches for the platform and competitors) returned links to third-party review sites and app stores that contained most of the substantive answer. The agent had to stitch together information from Google Play, LinkedIn, and investment review platforms rather than the primary domain.
• ›The agent correctly identified gaps that reflect poor site discoverability: no pricing page, vague fund descriptions using only metaphorical names, unclear fund holdings/composition, and missing support/tax information. These were legitimately absent from the site, not just hard to find.
• ›Site navigability was low for this task — a visitor wanting to understand the product, pricing, and competitive positioning would need to leave the domain. The site appears to be primarily a mobile app landing page or marketing funnel, not a comprehensive product information resource.