The agent successfully extracted what Kredytowy Poradnik does, who it serves, and how it's priced by fetching the homepage and FAQ page. However, critical information gaps remain unresolved on the site itself: commission amounts, scope of free services, and toolkit costs are either missing or ambiguous, forcing the agent to flag these as confusions rather than fill them from memory.

• ›Step [0] homepage provided the 9-step process and service offerings, but the compensation model remained vague until step [1]'s FAQ clarified that banks (not clients) pay the adviser after disbursement—a material fact only on the second page.
• ›Step [1]'s FAQ answered the critical 'how is it paid' question with a direct quote ('bez żadnych opłat'), but the site never quantifies the bank's payment or names the 14 banks, leaving verification impossible.
• ›The agent correctly identified the free consultation as a distinguishing claim but noted it lacked scope definition—the site lists 9 steps but doesn't specify which are included in the free tier versus paid add-ons.
• ›Paid digital products (e-book, calculator, course) were discoverable in the shop menu, but the agent did not fetch that page, so those prices came from the homepage snippet alone—a minor incompleteness but note that step [1] did not re-verify them.
• ›The site published no direct comparison to competitors and no methodology for the '99% positive decisions' claim, forcing the agent to note these as unverified rather than attribute them to the site's own transparency.