The agent assembled a reasonably complete explanation of GovAlta's purpose, audience, and differentiation by combining README files from GitHub repositories and the design system homepage, but had to work around a fragmented site structure where the root domain returns 404 and key information is scattered across multiple sites (github.io subpaths and an external design.alberta.ca domain). Pricing information could not be found despite targeted searching, leaving that aspect of the task only partially answered.

• ›Step [10] (ui-components README) and Step [11] (adsp-monorepo README) were the only content-bearing sources that directly answered 'what they do' — they contained the core service descriptions (component libraries and microservices platform). These were discovered via web search, not surface navigation.
• ›Step [13] (design.alberta.ca homepage) was cited as a source and provided branding/design system context, but the agent had to follow a cross-domain reference from the README to find it; govalta.github.io itself does not link to or explain this relationship.
• ›The site is poorly agent-navigable: the root domain (govalta.github.io) returns 404; documentation is split across govalta.github.io/adsp-monorepo, govalta.github.io/ui-components (a React playground, not docs), and design.alberta.ca; there is no unified homepage or index explaining what GovAlta offers. The agent had to rely on 73% prior artifact (likely cached GitHub content) and web search (18%) rather than discoverable site structure.
• ›Pricing, licensing, and differentiation from competitors (GC Design System, US Web Design System) could not be found on any of the fetched pages. The agent explicitly flagged these as 'Missing Information' — this represents a gap in task satisfaction.
• ›The relationship between ADSP and the UI components library is unclear from the fetched content; they appear to be separate offerings, but the sites do not explain whether they are interdependent or how they fit together.