The agent gathered a coherent overview of IELTS Mastery's core offering, audience, and feature set, but could not fulfill the pricing question due to site navigation gaps. The homepage and FAQ pages exposed most product details clearly, but the /pricing page contained only plan names with no prices, billing periods, or trial terms — forcing the agent to report 'unknown' cost and relay that questions should go to support.

• ›The /pricing page (step [2]) is a navigation dead-end: it exists in the site structure but contains no actual pricing data — only plan headings and a promotional tagline. This is a critical UX gap for an evaluation task.
• ›Step [0] (homepage) was the richest content source, returning a detailed feature list, free/premium tiers, and testimonials. Step [1] (FAQ) confirmed product scope and AI scoring approach but explicitly deferred pricing questions to support, signaling the site does not publish prices in customer-readable form.
• ›Two internal inconsistencies appear across the fetched pages: the source of 'Recent Exams' (student-reported vs. official Cambridge) is ambiguous, and the study plan is listed as both 'Coming Soon' and a premium feature. These conflicts are real site content, not agent errors.
• ›The agent discovered all three content-bearing pages by following site structure (homepage → FAQ link → /pricing link), confirming the site is navigable for discovery but deliberately obscures or omits pricing — likely a business model choice (contact sales) rather than a technical failure.
• ›The agent correctly identified unsupported claims ('87% hit target band', '1.5+ average band improvement', 'closely aligned' AI accuracy) as present in site text but lacking methodology or evidence. This is site content, not a retrieval failure.