The agent assembled a partial understanding of UNIR by piecing together web search results and third-party pages (Trustpilot, Uniscopio) after the main domain became inaccessible. It delivered a coherent overview of what UNIR offers, pricing, and positioning, but acknowledged it could not verify information directly from the site or compare competitors in depth.

• ›The target domain (unir.net/) returned HTTP 403, forcing the agent to rely entirely on search results and external sources rather than direct site content. The agent transparently disclosed this limitation.
• ›Search results (steps 3 and 8) were the primary source of factual substance: they surfaced linked institutional profiles, pricing pages, and overviews. The agent correctly attributed these as sources in the final response.
• ›Third-party page fetch (Trustpilot, step 6) added user sentiment and competitive benchmarking (rating comparisons to OBS, TECH Universidad) but did not directly explain UNIR's value proposition—the agent had to frame that from search snippets and external content.
• ›Pricing information came from search result links pointing to external sites (universidadesonline.es, uniscopio.com) and a US-based tuition page (unir.edu), not from unir.net itself. The agent correctly noted this was not directly verified.
• ›The agent identified a material risk: multiple UNIR entities (Spain-based vs. US unir.edu) exist, creating potential confusion. This observation was grounded in noticing inconsistencies across search results, not in site-provided clarification.