The agent retrieved core facts about Technorama's purpose, audiences, and pricing from the site's homepage and dedicated prices page, then supplemented with an external comparison to the Verkehrshaus. However, the site forced the agent to navigate across multiple pages to assemble a complete picture, omitted several details (timed entry, ID acceptance, family pass composition), and provided no meaningful comparative positioning—the agent had to rely on third-party sources and its own reasoning to explain how Technorama differs from alternatives.

• ›Pricing was not published on the homepage—the agent had to follow a 'Preise' link to a separate page, creating a two-step discovery burden for basic information.
• ›The site publishes prices in CHF but does not show final prices for some discounts (e.g., student/AHV 3 CHF off, Technorama Plus 3 CHF off), forcing the user to calculate or guess whether to visit.
• ›The site does not explicitly state whether day tickets are timed, whether children under 6 must be accompanied, or what IDs are accepted—common questions with no published answers.
• ›The agent had to rely on Wikipedia and tourism sites (fetched via web search, not site navigation) to confirm that Technorama is a science centre and to gather comparative context; the site itself does not position itself against competitors or explain why to choose it.
• ›The Technorama 2050 renovation project is mentioned on the homepage but has no timeline or clarity on operational impact, leaving visitors unable to plan.