The agent assembled a functional overview of QM Screener from the homepage metadata and web search results, but could not access pricing, plan details, or internal documentation because protected pages redirected to a login screen. The site exposed its core value proposition (momentum screener for six trading setups) via meta tags and search engine results, but withheld commercial and product details behind authentication.

• ›Step [1] (homepage fetch) returned rich meta description and keywords revealing the six screening patterns (Minervini, Qullamaggie, VCP, episodic pivot, parabolic short, ORH, ADR-filtered), which formed the backbone of the agent's explanation of what QM Screener does.
• ›Steps [2], [3], [6], [8], [9], [10] all returned identical login-wall pages (noindex, Geist fonts, GA tag), indicating that all non-public pages redirect to the same sign-in portal—no graceful public docs, FAQ, features page, or pricing page exists or is accessible without auth.
• ›Steps [12] and [15] (web search results) supplied external context about Mark Minervini trend templates, Qullamaggie episodic pivots, and competitor/reference screeners (Deepvue, ChartMill, Finviz), allowing the agent to infer positioning and audience; these searches were routed via query formulation rather than discovered on-site.
• ›The site is poorly agent-navigable: it publishes minimal information (homepage meta only), hides all business model, pricing, and feature details behind login, and does not provide structured data (JSON-LD, microdata) for public pages. The agent had to rely on prior knowledge of trading terminology and external search results to construct a coherent explanation.
• ›The agent explicitly flagged that pricing, plan differentiation, exact screen definitions, competitive comparison, and customer validation were not publicly discoverable—a significant gap for a discovery-evaluation task.