The agent successfully answered the task by fetching the homepage and fees page, which together provided clear, structured information on what TECHTONIC LAB does, who it serves, and how it is priced. The site was highly navigable and directly surfaced key facts in readable prose and tables; the agent identified several gaps (placement rates, certification coverage, instalment arithmetic, policy details) that reflect genuine omissions on the site rather than navigation failures.

• ›Step [0] (homepage) and Step [1] (fees page) were sufficient to answer all task requirements. The site publishes pricing, course offerings, target audience, and claimed differentiation directly on the main pages in formatted tables and bullet lists, requiring no search or inference.
• ›The agent correctly identified an arithmetic inconsistency (₹20k + ₹15k + ₹15k = ₹50,000, not ₹49,999) and flagged it as a confusing gap rather than assuming site error—grounded observation from actual content.
• ›Placement and outcome data are published only as named examples and employer lists on the homepage, with no rate, salary range, or time-to-placement figures provided by the site itself. The agent noted this gap accurately without inventing missing metrics.
• ›The site publishes detailed inclusions and exclusions on the fees page (/fees), making clear what is bundled (grooming, mock interviews, projects) and what is not (vendor exam fees, travel, laptop). This transparency was directly extracted, not inferred.
• ›The agent did not fetch the /placements, /faculty, or /batches pages, nor did it perform web search, and correctly noted in its final response that it limited scope to the homepage and fees page. This deliberate boundary is defensible given that the two fetched pages answered the core task.