The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive explanation of Knock's bridge loan service by combining official site content with competitor comparison articles, but had to work around significant pricing opacity on Knock's own domain—the 2.25% fee and key differentiation details came from external review sites, not from knock.com itself.

• ›Knock's homepage and /faq clearly explained the core value proposition (buy before you sell, eliminate contingencies), but the site never published its standard program fee—the agent found the 2.25% figure only via external comparison articles (step 6), not from knock.com.
• ›The /pricing page explicitly withheld fee details, directing users to apply or contact directly; this forced the agent to rely entirely on third-party sources for the pricing section of the final answer.
• ›Competitor comparisons (step 5–6) were critical to answering 'how it's different'—external sources provided the Orchard, Flyhomes, and Homeward contrasts that knock.com's own pages did not articulate.
• ›The /how-it-works page lacked step-by-step procedural detail, admittedly incomplete; the agent correctly flagged this as a navigation friction point and did not fabricate missing process steps.
• ›All core positioning facts (equity-based lending, 6-month term, agent flexibility, pricing alignment) required pulling from either the homepage or external sources; knock.com did not publish a structured competitive comparison or consolidated pricing guide.