The agent successfully gathered what Riveta Labs does, who it serves, how it's priced, and what differentiates it, but relied on educated guesses for several important details (Canvas-only support, multi-child pricing, age ranges) because the site did not explicitly address them. The site was navigable but sparse on comparative positioning and technical requirements.

• ›Steps [1], [2], and [6] directly answered the core task questions (what, who, pricing, differentiation) with complete, fetched content from the site itself. Step [5] added founder context and philosophy that grounded the 'infrastructure problem' framing.
• ›The agent attempted to follow two logical navigation paths ([3] /features and [4] /how-it-works) that returned 404s, suggesting incomplete site structure or routing. The agent pivoted to /about and /onetracker (both successful), showing good fallback judgment but also indicating the site's navigational surface is incomplete.
• ›Pricing was fully exposed in a dedicated /pricing page, but the final answer correctly identifies a notable absence: no free trial, only performance-based refund guarantees and a paid 10-Day Sprint. The site itself provided this contrast, not model inference.
• ›The agent's 'What Was Confusing' section flags Canvas-only compatibility, lack of competitive comparison, and missing details on sibling pricing and age ranges—none of which were addressed in the fetched content. These are acknowledged gaps rather than model hallucinations, showing honest boundary-setting.
• ›Founder background and philosophy (step [5]) were crucial to answering 'how it's different'—the site framed it as 'infrastructure' not 'therapy,' and the agent cited this distinction. This was site-provided and directly addressed the differentiation question.