Agent assembled a complete overview of General Evidence's positioning and capabilities from the homepage and about page, successfully answering the discovery task. However, a critical gap—pricing information—is genuinely absent from the public site, which the agent correctly identified rather than fabricated.

• ›Pricing is a genuine site gap, not a navigation failure: the agent tried /pricing (404) and /contact (which mentions pricing can be discussed but doesn't disclose it). The agent correctly reported this as missing rather than filling it from model memory.
• ›The site does not publish a sitemap or navigation that surfaces its own pages—the agent discovered /about and /contact by typing URLs from memory, not by following links. Only the 404 errors and the final homepage re-fetch were clearly routed; step [2] and [3] were guesses that paid off.
• ›Geographic scope (Germany/EU focus) is implied by 'German company,' 'Bonn,' 'GDPR-native,' and 'EU-hosted' language on the about page, but never explicitly stated as a limitation. The agent correctly flagged this as an inference rather than stated fact.
• ›The homepage (steps [0] and [5]) and about page (step [2]) together provided sufficient substance to answer 'what they do,' 'who it's for,' and 'how they differ.' The site's positioning language ('The evidence is already there,' 'observed behavior vs. recall') directly supported the differentiation section.
• ›Implementation details (how the AI Research Agent works 'under the hood') remain vague on the site itself—the agent noted this honestly. The site describes outputs (findings with sources and charts) but not the technical mechanism.