The agent fetched only the homepage via a summarizing fetch and produced a detailed picture of the protocol, audience, and gaps, though it did not open FAQ or contact sections separately and so the answer is only partly complete. The site was largely single-page, with most content as homepage sections rather than dedicated pages, making it navigable but not machine-friendly.

• ›All substantive content came from one homepage fetch; the site exposes its protocol, team, and FAQ as in-page sections rather than structured subpages.
• ›Pricing is entirely absent from the site, so the agent could only report what was not published.
• ›Several claims (1,500 implants/year, 'first of its kind', 'over 50 years') are self-reported and were flagged as unverifiable.
• ›Internal inconsistencies (premiere date vs. upcoming registration, conflicting doctor titles) make the documentary section hard to rely on.
• ›The agent acknowledged it did not open FAQ or contact sections separately, leaving some answer content unverified.