Agent successfully mapped the university's offerings, audience, and differentiation across the site, but uncovered a critical transparency gap: tuition pricing is not publicly disclosed online, requiring direct contact. Navigation was straightforward and site structure was internally coherent, but missing a key commercial detail.

• ›Pricing information absent from public site: Steps [1] and [5] explicitly confirmed no tuition, per-credit, or cost data exists on the website—only corporate discounts (up to 60%) and scholarship mentions. Agent correctly identified this as a friction point and cited the admissions contact requirement as the workaround.
• ›Admissions page [3] was the richest financial source, disclosing scholarships (merit, STEM, corporate discounts) and a $50 application fee, but still no base tuition—forcing users to contact the university to evaluate cost.
• ›About/differentiation content [4] supplied competitive positioning (bilingual, industry-aligned curriculum, AI feedback, global faculty) that is not commodity knowledge and demonstrates the site's clarity on its own positioning.
• ›Catalog PDF [6] attempted to provide comprehensive details but was corrupted/unreadable, representing a failed fallback for discovering pricing that might have been documented there.
• ›Site navigation was straightforward: homepage linked to /programs and /about; /programs linked to /admissions. Agent typed most URLs from memory (29%) rather than following discovered links, suggesting the site's internal linking may not be exhaustive or that top-level sections are discoverable but deeper financial docs are not surfaced.