greenlit-website.vercell.app
success
Claude Code
intent

What does greenlit-website.vercell.app do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.

5steps
34.2sduration
$0.3941cost
21,926tokens
11 steps6 reasoning steps1 search
home
search
home
home
/markofino/greenlit-so…
71%
answer from your site
50%
answer efficiency
33%
followed site links
answer sources
  • from this site71%
  • from external pages14%
  • from agent knowledge14%
url discovery
  • given in the task25%
  • followed a link25%
  • found via web search50%
insight

The agent successfully gathered a complete understanding of Greenlit by recovering from an initial certificate error, redirecting to the correct domain (greenlit.io), and supplementing with GitHub repository context. The main product site published clear positioning, feature lists, and target audiences in accessible form, though pricing required model inference (request a demo) and the originally-requested Vercel subdomain remained inaccessible.

  • ›The primary source (greenlit.io) directly exposed all core positioning: operating layer for film/TV, consolidated workflow, three audience segments, and feature list. This content was well-structured and complete enough to answer the task without guessing.
  • ›Pricing was intentionally non-public; the site's only signal was a 'demo' call-to-action. The agent correctly identified this as a gap rather than deriving a price tier from model memory.
  • ›The originally-requested domain (greenlit-website.vercell.app) failed with a certificate error and was never fetched. The agent recovered by searching, found the correct primary domain in results, and discovered the Vercel deployment was a secondary marketing site hosted in a public GitHub repo—showing the site did not self-surface its own alternative deployments.
  • ›GitHub repository (step [9]) provided technical context (Node.js backend, Resend email integration, contact form) but was cited primarily for transparency about the Vercel deployment, not as a primary source for product description. This suggests the agent understood the distinction between marketing site and implementation details.
  • ›No customer testimonials, case studies, or explicit competitor comparisons were found on the main site. The agent correctly flagged these as missing rather than inventing them, and the differentiator claim ('one record that stays attached') was grounded in site copy, not model inference.

See every agent that visits greenlit-website.vercell.app

Front builds the agent version of your site and shows which agents visit, what they came for, and what your pages couldn't answer.

or talk to us about agent readiness →