Agent successfully retrieved and synthesized the core facts about Courtelio's product, pricing, and positioning from the homepage and pricing page. The site clearly publishes what it does and costs, but leaves several concepts (poste, mandataire, annual discount application) undefined and relegates FAQ answers to a non-fetched or truncated page.

• ›Steps [0] and [1] directly supplied all pricing and feature claims. Step [2] (FAQ) listed questions but returned no answers, signaling incomplete or deferred content—agent correctly flagged this as missing data rather than asserting answers from memory.
• ›The site never formally defines 'poste' (billable seat) or 'poste mandataire' (15€/mo option); agent inferred 'poste' from context and labelled both as undefined, staying grounded in what was retrieved rather than guessing.
• ›Comparator and 'radar' features are mentioned only in one-line summaries with no detail on API mechanics, insurer integrations, or algorithm; agent reported this lacuna explicitly rather than inventing specifics.
• ›Origin story and differentiation claims rest entirely on the homepage mention of Sérénité Assurance as the design source; no independent validation, competitor names, or customer count provided; agent noted the testimonial conflict of interest.
• ›Annual discount toggle (−20%) is shown but not explained; agent flagged ambiguity about whether base prices already include it, refusing to assert what the pricing page did not state.