The agent retrieved the homepage and pricing page but could not fully answer the task: pricing for the core service remains unpublished, competitor differentiation was not discoverable on the site, and several claims (retroactive applications, expert certification criteria) lack supporting detail. The site's 'under construction' status and sparse service descriptions made it difficult to assemble a complete picture.

• ›Step [0] homepage contained the core service description (matching + expert support model) and program-level grant figures, but explicitly stated no platform or package pricing; step [1] confirmed the pricing page itself contains no prices, contents, or success-fee terms.
• ›The site does not compare itself to competitors or name alternatives, so the 'how it differs' section relies on claimed differentiators (curated programs, human support, GDPR compliance, retroactive applications) that are asserted but not explained or evidenced.
• ›Critical ambiguity on step [0]: the 'Potenzial-Check' cost of 'unter 1.000 €' is stated without clarifying whether that is the user's cost or total cost; the pricing page does not address this.
• ›The site marks itself 'im Aufbau' (under construction) with a October 2026 date, signaling incomplete content; this context frames the missing pricing and detail as intentional incompleteness rather than poor navigation.
• ›The agent was forced to guess at the free/paid boundary (Förder-Check appears free, packages are not free, but no explicit statement); this was discovered by checking both pages directly, not surfaced by clear labeling or a pricing table.