The agent retrieved core information about CEHL's co-op housing model, eligibility criteria, and pricing approach from three site pages, but the site leaves critical gaps: no rent figures, unclear pricing logic (25% vs. market rent split), missing direct rental eligibility, and no application process details. The agent assembled a functional overview but could not fully answer the 'how it's priced' and 'how it's different' questions due to incomplete site content.

• ›Step [0] exposed CEHL's core positioning and model via the homepage, but live statistics showed as '0' and pricing remained vague; the agent could not confirm headline numbers or exact rent-setting rules from the fetched content.
• ›Step [2] provided hard eligibility limits (income thresholds, asset caps, residency rules) in structured form, making that section answerable; however, the page did not cover application fees, process steps, or timeline.
• ›Step [1] on direct rentals was thin and did not explain eligibility, rent-setting, or how direct rentals differ operationally from co-op membership; the agent noted the linked 'Direct Rental Services' page was available but unread.
• ›The agent did not search the web or follow deeper internal links (e.g., 'How to apply,' 'Contact us,' or the direct rental services page) because the homepage and eligibility/rentals pages appeared to cover the main questions; this was a reasonable triage but left the pricing and application process sections incomplete.
• ›The site's pricing model is genuinely ambiguous in the fetched pages: a 25% income-linked rent exists, market rent exists, but the allocation rule and dollar ranges are not published, forcing the agent to report the ambiguity rather than fill it from memory.