The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Graphitex by combining web search results with attempts to fetch the website directly, working around the site's JavaScript-heavy architecture and lack of transparent pricing. The website itself returned mostly raw HTML with limited extractable text, forcing the agent to rely heavily on search results and prior knowledge to answer the task. Key information about what Graphitex does, who it serves, and how it differs was pieced together from search snippets and inferred business context rather than clearly surfaced on the site itself.

• ›Steps [1], [6], [12], [13] returned the site's main pages but as Nuxt-rendered JavaScript bundles with minimal extractable content—the agent could not meaningfully parse product, pricing, or positioning details from the raw HTML responses.
• ›Steps [9], [10], [14], [15], [16] (web searches) were the primary content-bearing sources; search snippets and result titles provided concrete facts about Graphitex being a Belgian workwear supplier, their customization techniques (screen printing, embroidery, DTF), their location in Awans, and their B2B focus.
• ›The agent's final response cites search results as sources but does not cite any of the fetched website pages ([1], [6], [12], [13]), indicating those fetches did not yield usable content—they served as discovery attempts only.
• ›Pricing information was completely absent from the site (step [3] returned 404 for /pricing); the agent correctly identified this as a gap and reported that Graphitex operates on a quote-based model, relying on search results and inferred B2B practice patterns.
• ›The agent successfully inferred competitive differentiation (in-house operations, regional focus, sustainability, European partnerships, flexibility on minimums) by comparing Graphitex to named competitors (Printful, Custom Ink, ThreadBird, Bolt Printing) mentioned in search results—not from the Graphitex site itself.
• ›The site's lack of transparent pricing, stated minimums, turnaround times, and explicit competitive positioning meant the agent had to backfill these gaps with domain knowledge and industry comparisons, reducing confidence in answers about those specific aspects.