Agent successfully understood and explained Stockkeep by extracting information from the homepage alone. The site concentrated all key information on a single landing page, making the tool describable without dedicated pricing, FAQ, or About pages—but this required the agent to attempt multiple missing URLs and infer gaps from failures.

• ›Steps [0] and [2] both fetched stockkeep.app/ (homepage) and returned substantively different content sections—the homepage appears to contain multiple distinct explanatory blocks that the agent's two independent fetches surfaced differently, rather than being a single static response. This suggests the agent was reading different sections of rich homepage content on separate calls.
• ›Pricing, feature tier clarity, and differentiators were all present on the homepage; no secondary pages were needed for the task despite attempts to fetch /pricing, /faq, and /about (all 404). The site chose to answer the entire brief on the home page rather than distributing it.
• ›The agent correctly identified that feature ownership was 'split' between Forecast and Pro tiers (reorder points in Forecast, month-end close in Pro) based on homepage content, not from dedicated documentation—this is a legitimate observation of site structure, not model memory.
• ›All agent-attempted supplementary URLs (pricing page, FAQ, About) returned 404, signaling either that the site has a minimal structure or deliberately consolidates everything on the homepage. This is content-bearing information about site design philosophy, not a navigation failure.
• ›The agent's final answer contained no explicit source citations, but all factual claims about Stockkeep's features, pricing, and differentiation map directly to step [0] and [2] homepage content; the 'confusing or missing' section accurately reflects step [1], [3], [4] failures.