The agent successfully built a complete explanation of HMR Konsultan's services, pricing, and positioning, but had to guess the costs page URL after the site's own navigation failed to surface it. The homepage provided positioning and high-level services; the costs page provided the detailed fee breakdown needed to answer the 'how it's priced' question.

• ›Step [0] (homepage) returned a model-summarized overview (not raw HTML), stating that a 'What it costs' page existed and linking to `/about-labuan/costs`, but that URL was wrong. The agent had to type `/labuan/costs` from memory in step [3], revealing navigation friction.
• ›Step [3] was the sole source of concrete pricing: all fee figures (USD 3,950 year one, USD 3,300 annually, statutory fees, compliance costs, work permit fees) came from this single costs page. The homepage deliberately withheld prices, forcing the agent to find a separate page.
• ›The homepage's competitor claims ('many firms are not licensed') were one-sided and unsupported by evidence the agent found. The site does not publish third-party reviews, case studies, or a public comparison page the agent actually retrieved.
• ›The agent had to infer from step [0]'s summary that the homepage contained a link to `/labuan/compare` but never fetched it, so the differentiation claims remain partially unverified against the site's own comparison resource.
• ›Several pricing elements (economic substance spending RM50,000–RM20,000/yr, staff salaries USD 17,100/yr) are presented as required costs on the costs page but are not fees charged by HMR; the site mixes service pricing with mandatory business expenses and employment costs, requiring careful reading to separate them.