The agent fetched the homepage and FAQ directly, typed from memory, and extracted a clear picture of the employer-facing recruitment service along with its pricing and competitive claims. The site was largely navigable and gave concrete pricing and comparison content on the FAQ page, though the homepage's fixed-monthly claim conflicts with per-placement and hourly billing elsewhere.

• ›The FAQ page at /veelgestelde-vragen/ published concrete 'from' prices (€8,750 and €7,750 per placement) and a worked comparison against 20% agency fees, which is the most substantive machine-readable answer in the run.
• ›The homepage and FAQ disagree on billing basis (fixed monthly vs per placement vs per hour), so the agent had to report the inconsistency rather than resolve it.
• ›Key contract, guarantee, and cancellation terms are deferred to a linked 'Algemene voorwaarden' page that the agent did not open, leaving a gap in the answer.
• ›Both fetched pages were available as clean content with links, but the agent entered them from memory rather than discovering them via search, indicating the site is reachable by predictable paths.
• ›Claims such as the 'gegarandeerd resultaat' guarantee and the 3-month timeline are presented without definitions, which the agent correctly flagged as unclear rather than repeating as fact.