The agent fetched the homepage and the /vendre page, which together gave a clear picture of the broker's services, areas, seller process, and free valuation offer. The site was readable and fetchable, but it published no fee structure or licence number, and the agent did not read the buy, about, listings, or blog pages in full.

• ›The homepage alone exposed services, geography, credentials, and contact details in plain text, so the core answer was sourced directly from the site.
• ›Pricing is absent: the only financial offer is a free valuation, so cost to clients could not be determined from the site.
• ›No licence number, regulator reference beyond a caption, or office address is published, which weakens agent verification of the business.
• ›The Google review count (81) conflicts with the seven reviews displayed, a discrepancy the site does not explain.
• ›Subpages linked from the homepage (/acheter, /a-propos, /inscriptions, blog) were not read, so the answer rests on the two pages fetched plus headings.