The agent read the thin homepage and the privacy-terms page, then fell back to web search for pricing after the FAQ returned HTTP 410, so the answer is only partly grounded in duck.ai's own content. The comparison to alternatives was not researched and rests on general framing, leaving the task partially met.

• ›The homepage offered only a one-line tagline ('Private AI chat. Free.') with no feature list or navigable links, so the agent could not learn the product from the site itself.
• ›The privacy-terms page was substantive and fetchable, carrying detailed retention, provider, and age-policy facts that supported most of the privacy answer.
• ›Pricing and tier information was absent from duck.ai's own pages and had to come from third-party search snippets and secondary articles, which disagreed on model names.
• ›The /duckai and /duckai/faq paths returned HTTP 410 Gone, so the most likely canonical product and help pages were unreachable.
• ›No competitor information was retrieved, so the comparison to alternatives is unverified framing.