The agent successfully gathered a comprehensive understanding of Tenet Local by fetching the homepage, pricing page, and service page. The site is navigable and publishes most positioning and scope information in accessible prose, but deliberately withholds pricing figures and defines eligibility criteria only in general terms, forcing the agent to catalogue gaps rather than resolve them.

• ›Pricing is explicitly unpublished: the site states fees are 'confirmed in writing before you decide' but provides no published monthly or setup amounts, even as ranges. This is intentional—the agent did not miss a hidden fee table.
• ›The site positions itself through focus (landscaping-specific), method (combined SEO + AEO), and process (audit-first, no guarantees), but never names or compares competitors; the agent's comparison to 'other SEO agencies' and 'Google Ads' is model inference, not site-derived.
• ›The pilot acceptance criteria are published but vague: 'established' companies with 'real' projects and 'eligible' Google Business Profiles, but the site does not define these terms or explain how strictly they are enforced.
• ›The site includes a free audit and a 15-minute call as discovery tools, both linked from the homepage, making entry low-friction—the agent correctly identified these as the path to answers not published on the site.
• ›Reporting methodology is detailed (five buyer questions checked monthly across two AI tools) but the two specific AI tools are not named, and the agent's attempt to fill this gap would require fetching a linked page ('Trial, billing & ownership terms') that was not included in the trajectory.