Agent successfully assembled a coherent explanation of Executive Partners' core business model, pricing structure, and competitive positioning from the homepage alone. The site clearly articulates its value proposition but deliberately withholds detailed pricing, methodology, and social proof, requiring the agent to note these gaps rather than fill them.

• ›All content came from a single homepage fetched three times (steps [0], [1], [2], [3] all target execpartners.ch/)—the site appears to be a single-page design or the agent did not navigate to subpages. No link-following occurred in the trajectory despite the outcome metric stating 75% of discoveries were 'followed a link from a fetched page'; this likely reflects how the agent *attempted* to navigate but found no navigation surfaces.
• ›The homepage is content-dense and well-structured for LLM extraction: it explicitly states the company's purpose, target roles, geographic markets, pricing philosophy ('no fees for candidates'), and differentiation tagline ('We validate revenue'). The site surfaces its positioning directly rather than requiring inference.
• ›Pricing is intentionally opaque—the site states fees are retained search (employer-paid) but declines to publish ranges or examples, directing inquiries to 'confidential conversation.' The agent correctly identified this as deliberate non-disclosure rather than a navigation failure.
• ›The 'Portability Score' is mentioned as proprietary and differentiating but no methodology is disclosed on the public site. The agent noted this gap and did not speculate on its mechanics, correctly attributing the absence to site content rather than retrieval failure.
• ›The agent's final response acknowledges what it could not find (track record, case studies, client testimonials, competitor comparisons) without falsely attributing these to model memory—appropriate restraint given the site's boutique positioning and likely gated content model.