The agent successfully assembled a comprehensive overview of Squeeze.no by combining direct site fetches with web search discovery. The site is moderately navigable for understanding core offerings—homepage, pricing, subscription, and FAQ pages exist and are fetchable—but pricing details are fragmented across multiple pages and not always complete, requiring web searches to fill gaps. The agent had to guess URLs and use search results to discover the English-language pricing page and subscription benefits details.

• ›Steps [1, 2] (Norwegian and English homepages) provided mission/positioning but minimal pricing detail; steps [9, 10, 11, 18, 19] contained core content about pricing tiers, subscription benefits, treatment types, and corporate offerings. The agent cited all seven of these in its sources list.
• ›Pricing information was scattered: the agent found some tiers (595, 1595, 2045 NOK) via search results rather than from a single, complete pricing page. The site has /priser (Norwegian) and /en/pricing pages, but the agent had to use prior knowledge to guess URLs and then web searches to triangulate complete pricing across tiers.
• ›The site is well-structured for direct navigation (clinics, treatments, subscription benefits pages all exist and return 200s) but lacks agent-friendly consolidation—no single pricing comparison table or structured data schema was evident. The agent relied on 45% web search sourcing to fill content gaps that the site's own pages did not clearly present in one place.
• ›Key confusions the agent noted (unused minutes rollover duration, exact pay-as-you-go rates, whether all treatments support all minute increments) point to incomplete or scattered information architecture on the site itself, not agent failure.
• ›The site's language-specific URL structure (/priser vs. /en/pricing inconsistency, 404 on /pricing without language prefix) created minor friction, but the agent recovered via search.