The agent fetched the homepage and FAQ and produced a clear, well-grounded explanation of KB&B's services, audience, and claims, but could not answer the pricing question because the FAQ answers were absent from the fetched content. It correctly flagged unsourced statistics and the '0%' rendering problems, and noted it did not check the Cases or Leistungen pages.

• ›The homepage exposed the four-step service model, nine units, client list, and industries in fetchable text, so the core 'what they do' answer was directly retrievable.
• ›Pricing was the key gap: the FAQ page showed question headings ('Was kostet eine Zusammenarbeit', 'Was kostet ein Strategieprojekt?') with no answers, so the answer had to be a 'not published' finding.
• ›Several headline metrics (+34% brand awareness, 92% efficiency, 100% brand safety) appeared with no methodology, and three stats rendered as '0%', reducing the trustworthiness of the page as a machine-readable source.
• ›Differentiation came only from self-described claims; the site offers no named competitor comparison, so the 'alternatives' part of the task could not be answered from the site itself.