The agent fetched the homepage, About page and Methodology page and assembled a thorough, well-sourced explanation of the site's tools, audience, funding and assumptions. The site was highly navigable and transparent, though it does not name its operator and some headline figures lack stated context on the homepage.

• ›The methodology page publishes explicit assumptions (heat pump SPF 2.55–3.05, 9 kW system size, grant amounts, price sources), making the site's figures verifiable and easy to explain.
• ›The About page clearly states funding and monetisation (free tools, labelled affiliate links, paused quote referrals), which directly answered the pricing and business-model parts of the task.
• ›The operator's identity is not named on any fetched page, leaving a gap the agent had to report rather than fill.
• ›Headline numbers on the homepage (£5,200 post-grant heat pump cost, £1,885 annual bill) lack their pre-grant cost and assumptions; the agent only resolved these by reading the methodology page.
• ›Date inconsistencies between pages (review date 25 Sept vs. inputs dated 5 Oct; 'October 2026' vs 'Oct–Dec 2026' price cap) would require a reader to check before relying on specific figures.