The agent retrieved descriptions of slutbetyg.se's core features, pricing structure, and data sources from the homepage and developer page, but could not fully answer the differentiation question because the site does not name competitors or explain its positioning relative to alternatives. The site published its own facts clearly but left gaps on terms, disclaimers, exact pricing, and scholarship detail-page content.

• ›The homepage and developer page (steps [0] and [1]) surfaced most core facts directly — merit calculators, admission cut-offs, scholarship count, school registry, and the MCP server model. The agent did not need to guess these.
• ›Pricing is only partially exposed: the website itself appears free to browse (not explicitly stated), but the API charges "en liten avgift" with rates delegated to xpay.tools, which the agent did not fetch. This is a content gap, not a navigation failure.
• ›The differentiation section relies on model memory (Swedish education ecosystem knowledge), not on site content, because slutbetyg.se does not position itself against alternatives or explain why users should choose it over gymnasium.se, betygskartan.se, or official admissions offices.
• ›The agent did not fetch scholarship detail pages or /llms.txt (mentioned on the developer page), so it could not verify scholarship summary disclaimers, amounts, or deadlines. Step [2] was a category index, not listing details, creating a hard content boundary.
• ›The site's own navigation and labeling are clear and semantic (paths like /stipendier, /utvecklare, /gymnasieskolor), but critical cross-domain information — free/paid status, terms, about page, FAQ — is not published anywhere the agent reached.