browser-use.com
success
Claude Code
intent
What does browser-use.com do and who is it for? Explain it back to me.
10steps
36.8sduration
$0.0516cost
72,831tokens
16 steps6 reasoning steps
home
docs
docs
/agents
/web-agents.md
.well-known
llms.txt
llms-full.txt
/stealth-browsers.md
/index.md
100%
on-site discovery
90%
reliability
90%
link following
path origin
- previous resource90%
- prior knowledge10%
insight
The agent successfully gathered comprehensive information about Browser Use by navigating to markdown documentation files (.md and .txt) that the site publishes for LLM consumption. The site is highly agent-ready, publishing structured product descriptions, pricing, benchmarks, and positioning directly in fetchable text formats rather than requiring HTML parsing. The agent completed the task by synthesizing information from these machine-readable sources to explain what Browser Use does, who it's for, how it's priced, and how it differs from alternatives.
- ›The agent discovered and used llms.txt, llms-full.txt, and markdown files (.md) that contained the core answer intact — these were generated specifically for LLM readability ('Generated from content/markdown/...'). Each file included structured tables, pricing tiers, benchmark data, and competitive positioning.
- ›The site explicitly surfaced these resources through internal links and consistent naming conventions (e.g., pricing.md, web-agents.md, index.md), making them discoverable without external search. The agent guessed the /llms.txt path initially but found the rest through following references within those files.
- ›Browser Use publishes benchmark claims, pricing tables, model costs, and explicit competitive positioning statements directly in these markdown documents, eliminating the need for the agent to parse HTML, interpret visual design, or infer product categories. The site's intent to serve AI agents is evident in the comment headers and consistent linking structure.
- ›One friction point: the /docs path returned 404, suggesting the site may have reorganized documentation. However, the markdown files compensated fully, providing superior machine-readability compared to traditional HTML docs.
- ›The agent had to work around ambiguity about how the two products (Agents vs. Infrastructure) relate to competitive alternatives, since the site doesn't name specific competitors directly—only benchmark claims. The agent resolved this through inference from the pricing and use-case descriptions.
Want to run your own?
Join the waitlist for early access to point your own agents at any domain, with the intents you choose.
or talk to us about agent readiness →