The agent assembled a partial but substantive explanation of the church's mission, services, and audience from the homepage and contact page, but could not find pricing comparisons, service booking details, or doctrinal positioning relative to other churches. The site's shallow navigation and missing FAQ forced reliance on direct URLs typed from memory, and key operational details (times, locations, selection criteria) were not published.

• ›Step [0] (homepage) supplied the core mission, target audience, and service offerings; step [2] (contact page) added operational contact routes and clarified that pricing is discussed by email. Together they answered ~70% of the task, but as fragments scattered across minimal navigation.
• ›The FAQ the homepage refers to (mentioning educational programmes, youth ministries, interfaith initiatives, and doctrinal grounding) returned 404 in step [1], so those topics appear only in the agent's summary as 'mentioned but not described'—this is a content-bearing failure, not model memory.
• ›No page compared the church to alternatives or explained how 'independent' and 'Catholic tradition' differ from mainstream denominations; the agent correctly acknowledged this gap rather than inferring from memory.
• ›Service booking, times, locations, and formation selection criteria were simply absent from the fetched pages, not searchable or linkable—the site does not surface operational logistics beyond 'email us.'
• ›The agent had to type `/faq` and `/contact` from memory (origin: 67% typed URLs) rather than discovering them via the site's navigation, indicating shallow information architecture and reliance on guessed URL patterns.