Agent successfully extracted core business logic, audience, and pricing structure from the site, but pricing transparency was limited—all paid tiers required sales contact, forcing reliance on site navigation and omitting specific per-unit costs. The site is German-only and does not publish explicit competitive positioning.

• ›Homepage [1] and navigation page [4] provided foundational positioning (AI-powered renovation planning for Germany, multi-stakeholder audience), but neither contained pricing; the agent had to navigate to the business page [10] to find even the tier names.
• ›Pricing page (/pricing) returned 404 [2], so pricing information came entirely from the enterprise-focused page [10] (/unternehmen), which exposed tiers but only listed actual prices for the Free tier (€0); all other tiers were 'Price on request'—the site deliberately hides per-seat or per-feature costs.
• ›Differentiation claims ('physics-based DIN V 18599 calculations', 'legally valid certificates', 'portfolio-level decision making') came exclusively from the real-estate-company segment page [6], not homepage; the site compartmentalizes value propositions by persona rather than centralizing them.
• ›Web search [9] returned no competitive comparison data or published pricing on third-party sites; Reduco does not appear to be reviewed or benchmarked publicly, limiting external validation.
• ›Agent had to infer from site structure that Reduco targets B2B (companies with portfolios, energy consultants, banks) in addition to homeowners, since the homepage lists 9 distinct stakeholder personas—a sign the platform is multi-modal but the marketing is fragmented across pages.